When the Mazda CX-50 was introduced, many wondered about the fate of the popular CX-5. Would Mazda discontinue the older model, or keep both in production? Historically, Mazda has taken different approaches, sometimes replacing older models outright, and other times keeping them as budget options. With the CX-50’s arrival, it seemed like the CX-5 might be phased out. However, Mazda has chosen to keep the CX-5 around, offering it in a wide range of trims, positioning it as a more affordable alternative to the newer CX-50. This leaves car buyers wondering: what are the key differences between these two compact SUVs, and which one should you choose? Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of the CX-5 and CX-50.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: Dimensions and Size Comparison
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 compete in the crowded compact SUV segment. However, within this class, vehicles can vary significantly in size. The CX-5 leans towards the smaller end of the spectrum. At 180 inches long, it’s notably shorter than competitors like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan. While seemingly a small difference, this translates to less rear legroom, which can be noticeable for taller passengers. The CR-V and Tiguan generally offer more spacious rear seating.
Recognizing the demand for more space, Mazda designed the CX-50 to be larger. It measures 6 inches longer than the CX-5. This increased length translates to improvements in both passenger room and cargo capacity. While the Honda CR-V and VW Tiguan still offer more overall space, the CX-50 provides a more comfortable and practical interior compared to the CX-5, making it a better choice for those prioritizing passenger and cargo volume.
CX-5 vs. CX-50: Performance and Engine Options
Mazda has carried over the CX-5’s powertrain options to the CX-50, ensuring similar performance characteristics between the two models, at least initially. Both SUVs come standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides adequate power for daily driving.
For drivers seeking more spirited performance, both the CX-5 and CX-50 offer a turbocharged version of the 2.5-liter engine. This turbo variant delivers 227 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque when using regular 87 octane gasoline. Opting for premium 93 octane fuel boosts output to 256 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque. Equipped with the turbocharged engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 rank among the quicker non-luxury compact SUVs available, offering brisk acceleration and responsive power.
However, the CX-50 gains a significant advantage with the introduction of a hybrid powertrain for the 2025 model year. This hybrid system, sourced from Toyota, combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The CX-50 Hybrid boasts a significantly improved fuel economy, achieving an EPA-estimated 38 mpg in combined driving. This is a considerable leap in efficiency compared to both the standard 2.5-liter engine (28 mpg combined) and the turbocharged engine (25 mpg combined). Currently, a hybrid option is not available for the Mazda CX-5, making the CX-50 Hybrid a compelling choice for fuel-conscious buyers.
Conclusion: Choosing Between the CX-5 and CX-50
Deciding between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 ultimately depends on your priorities. The CX-5 remains a compelling option for buyers seeking a stylish and well-equipped compact SUV at a more accessible price point. Its slightly smaller dimensions might be advantageous for navigating tight city streets and parking spaces.
On the other hand, the CX-50 offers a more spacious interior, a slightly more rugged aesthetic, and for the 2025 model year, a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain. If you prioritize passenger and cargo space, and are interested in hybrid technology, the CX-50 is the stronger contender. Consider your budget, space requirements, and performance needs to determine which Mazda compact SUV best suits your lifestyle.
