Chevrolet Volt 2019 Safety Ratings: A Comprehensive Review for Car Buyers

The Chevrolet Volt 2019, a plug-in hybrid praised for its fuel efficiency and electric driving range, also holds its own in safety. For prospective buyers prioritizing safety, understanding the Chevrolet Volt 2019 safety ratings is crucial. This article delves into a detailed analysis of the safety performance of the Chevrolet Volt 2019, drawing on rigorous testing data to provide a comprehensive overview.

Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Driver-Side Evaluation

The small overlap front crash test simulates a challenging real-world scenario where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end collides with another vehicle or a narrow object. The Chevrolet Volt 2019 underwent this test, and the results offer valuable insights into its structural integrity and occupant protection.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Small Overlap Front: Driver-Side Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures – Head/neck Good
Driver injury measures – Chest Good
Driver injury measures – Hip/thigh Good
Driver injury measures – Lower leg/foot Good
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Acceptable

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 achieved a “Good” rating in the small overlap front crash test, the highest possible rating. This indicates that the vehicle’s structure effectively resisted intrusion, maintaining the driver’s survival space. All driver injury measures were rated as “Good,” signifying a low risk of significant injuries in this type of crash. However, the driver restraints and dummy kinematics were rated as “Acceptable”. The test results showed the dummy’s head contacted the frontal airbag but slid off the left side due to excessive forward movement allowed by the seatbelt. Despite this, the side curtain airbag deployed effectively, providing sufficient forward coverage.

The action shot from the small overlap frontal crash test demonstrates the impact dynamics on the Chevrolet Volt 2019.

Post-crash analysis of the dummy’s position in the Chevrolet Volt 2019 reveals that the driver’s survival space was well-maintained. The structural integrity of the vehicle played a key role in achieving this outcome.

This image illustrates the dummy’s head interaction with the airbags during the Chevrolet Volt 2019 small overlap test. It highlights the slight issue of the head sliding off the frontal airbag, which contributed to the “Acceptable” rating in driver restraints.

The assessment of leg and foot injury risk in the Chevrolet Volt 2019 small overlap test indicated low risk, further contributing to the overall “Good” rating for driver injury measures.

Below are the technical measurements recorded during the small overlap front crash test of the Chevrolet Volt 2019:

Technical Measurements: Small Overlap Front Test

Measurement Category Evaluation criteria Measurement
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side) Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 9
Footrest (cm) 4
Left toepan (cm) 2
Brake pedal (cm) 4
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Steering column 1
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 7
Upper dash (cm) 8
Lower instrument panel (cm) 7
Driver Injury Measures Head HIC-15 103
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck Tension (kN) 1.1
Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) 11
Maximum Nij 0.18
Chest maximum compression (mm) 19
Femur – Left (kN) 0.1
Femur – Right (kN) 0.6
Knee displacement – Left (mm) 0
Knee displacement – Right (mm) 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Left (%) 0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Right (%) 0
Maximum tibia index – Left 0.57
Maximum tibia index – Right 0.65
Tibia axial force – Left (kN) 1.2
Tibia axial force – Right (kN) 2.0
Foot acceleration – Left (g) 33
Foot acceleration – Right (g) 34

Moderate Overlap Front Crash Test: Original Evaluation

In the moderate overlap front crash test, a significant portion of the vehicle’s front end impacts a deformable barrier. The Chevrolet Volt 2019 also performed admirably in this more traditional frontal crash test.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Moderate Overlap Front: Original Test Good
Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures – Head/neck Good
Driver injury measures – Chest Good
Driver injury measures – Leg/foot, left Acceptable
Driver injury measures – Leg/foot, right Good
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics Good

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 secured a “Good” overall rating in the moderate overlap front crash test. Similar to the small overlap test, structural integrity was rated “Good,” and most driver injury measures were also “Good.” The left leg/foot injury measure received an “Acceptable” rating, while the right leg/foot remained at “Good.” Driver restraints and dummy kinematics were rated as “Good,” indicating effective airbag and seatbelt performance in this scenario.

Technical Measurements: Moderate Overlap Front Test

Measurement Category Evaluation criteria Measurement
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side) Footrest (cm) 5
Left footwell (cm) 6
Center footwell (cm) 9
Right footwell (cm) 8
Brake pedal (cm) 5
Instrument panel rearward movement – Left (cm) 0
Instrument panel rearward movement – Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement – Upward (cm) 3
Steering column movement – Rearward (cm) -1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0
Driver Injury Measures Head HIC-15 204
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck Tension (kN) 0.8
Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) 14
Maximum Nij 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm) 27
Femur force – left (kN) 0.3
Femur force – right (kN) 0.8
Knee displacement – left (mm) 0
Knee displacement – right (mm) 2
Maximum tibia index – left 0.83
Maximum tibia index – right 0.64
Tibia axial force – left (kN) 1.8
Tibia axial force – right (kN) 3.3
Foot acceleration – Left (g) 65
Foot acceleration – Right (g) 85

Side Crash Test: Original Evaluation

Side impacts are particularly dangerous, making side crash protection a critical safety aspect. The Chevrolet Volt 2019 underwent a side crash test to evaluate its ability to protect occupants in such collisions.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Side Crash: Original Test Good
Overall evaluation Good
Structure and safety cage Good
Driver injury measures – Head/neck Good
Driver injury measures – Torso Good
Driver injury measures – Pelvis/leg Good
Driver head protection Good
Rear passenger injury measures – Head/neck Good
Rear passenger injury measures – Torso Good
Rear passenger injury measures – Pelvis/leg Good
Rear passenger head protection Good

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 earned a “Good” rating in the side crash test, demonstrating robust protection for both driver and rear passengers. All injury measures for both front and rear occupants were rated as “Good,” along with driver and rear passenger head protection. This strong performance indicates effective side structure and airbag deployment.

Technical Measurements: Side Crash Test

Measurement Category Evaluation criteria Measurement
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side) B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat (cm) -18.0
Driver Injury Measures Head HIC-15 366
Neck Tension (kN) 0.7
Neck Compression (kN) 0.0
Shoulder Lateral deflection (mm) 23
Shoulder Lateral force (kN) 1.4
Torso Maximum deflection (mm) 32
Torso Average deflection (mm) 30
Torso Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.73
Torso Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.35
Pelvis Iliac force (kN) 0.8
Pelvis Acetabulum force (kN) 1.3
Pelvis Combined force (kN) 2.0
Left femur L-M force (kN) 0.4
Left femur L-M moment (Nm) 60
Left femur A-P moment (Nm) 95
Passenger Injury Measures Head HIC-15 228
Neck Tension (kN) 0.2
Neck Compression (kN) 0.7
Shoulder Lateral deflection (mm) 19
Shoulder Lateral force (kN) 1.1
Torso Maximum deflection (mm) 21
Torso Average deflection (mm) 17
Torso Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 1.31
Torso Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.12
Pelvis Iliac force (kN) 0.5
Pelvis Acetabulum force (kN) 0.8
Pelvis Combined force (kN) 1.1
Left femur L-M force (kN) 0.1
Left femur L-M moment (Nm) 40
Left femur A-P moment (Nm) 150

Roof Strength Test

Roof strength is vital in rollover accidents. The Chevrolet Volt 2019 underwent a roof strength test to assess its ability to withstand such events.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Roof Strength Good
Overall evaluation Good
Curb weight 3,480 lbs
Peak force 17,081 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.91

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 achieved a “Good” rating in roof strength. With a strength-to-weight ratio of 4.91, the roof demonstrated significant resistance, exceeding safety standards and providing strong protection in rollover scenarios.

Head Restraints & Seats Evaluation

Head restraints and seats play a crucial role in preventing whiplash and other neck injuries in rear-end collisions. The Chevrolet Volt 2019‘s head restraints and seats were evaluated for their effectiveness.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Head Restraints & Seats Good
Overall evaluation Good
Dynamic rating Good
Seat/head restraint geometry Good

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 received a “Good” rating for its head restraints and seats. Both dynamic rating and seat/head restraint geometry were rated “Good,” indicating effective design in minimizing whiplash risk in rear impacts.

Technical Measurements: Head Restraints & Seats

Measurement Category Seat type Manual cloth seat
Geometry Backset (mm) 22
Distance below top of head (mm) 26
Seat design parameters Pass/fail Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g) 15.1
Head contact time (ms) 58
Force rating 1
Neck forces Max neck shear force (N) 33
Max neck tension (N) 401

Headlights Performance

Visibility is paramount for accident prevention. The Chevrolet Volt 2019‘s headlight performance was assessed across different trim levels and headlight variations.

Headlight Variation 1: Premier trim with Driver Confidence II package

Evaluation criteria Rating
Headlights – Premier trim with Driver Confidence II package Good
Overall rating Good
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes

The Premier trim of the Chevrolet Volt 2019 equipped with the Driver Confidence II package features LED projector low beams and halogen reflector high beams and earned a “Good” overall headlight rating. The high-beam assist feature contributed to this top rating.

Technical Measurements: Headlights – Premier trim with Driver Confidence II package

Measurement Category Evaluation criteria Measurement
Overall rating Good
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
LOW BEAMS Straightaway right edge 92.4 m
Straightaway left edge 64.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 71.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.7 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 49.4 m
HIGH BEAMS Straightaway right edge 180.7 m
Straightaway left edge 108.4 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 79.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 68.8 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 62.7 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.2 m

Headlight Variation 2: LT trim and Premier trim (standard)

Evaluation criteria Rating
Headlights – LT trim and Premier trim (standard) Acceptable
Overall rating Acceptable
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No

The standard headlights on the LT and Premier trims of the Chevrolet Volt 2019, also featuring LED projector low beams and halogen reflector high beams but without high-beam assist, received an “Acceptable” rating.

Technical Measurements: Headlights – LT trim and Premier trim (standard)

Measurement Category Evaluation criteria Measurement
Overall rating Acceptable
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
LOW BEAMS Straightaway right edge 92.4 m
Straightaway left edge 64.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 71.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.7 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 49.4 m
HIGH BEAMS Straightaway right edge 180.7 m
Straightaway left edge 108.4 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 79.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 68.8 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 62.7 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.2 m

Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle

Crash prevention technology is increasingly important in modern vehicles. The Chevrolet Volt 2019 offers front crash prevention systems, evaluated for their effectiveness.

Front Crash Prevention System 1: Optional Forward Automatic Braking

Evaluation criteria Rating
Front Crash Prevention (Vehicle-to-Vehicle) – Optional Forward Automatic Braking Superior
Overall evaluation Superior
System details Optional Forward Automatic Braking
Package name Optional Adaptive Cruise Control

With the optional Forward Automatic Braking system, part of the Adaptive Cruise Control package, the Chevrolet Volt 2019 achieved a “Superior” rating in vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention. The system successfully avoided collisions in both 12 mph and 25 mph tests and meets forward collision warning requirements.

Front Crash Prevention System 2: Optional Low Speed Forward Automatic Braking

Evaluation criteria Rating
Front Crash Prevention (Vehicle-to-Vehicle) – Optional Low Speed Forward Automatic Braking Advanced
Overall evaluation Advanced
System details Optional Low Speed Forward Automatic Braking
Package name Optional Driver Confidence Package II

The optional Low Speed Forward Automatic Braking system, available with the Driver Confidence Package II, earned an “Advanced” rating. While it avoided collision in the 12 mph test, it reduced impact speed by 5 mph in the 25 mph test. This system also meets forward collision warning requirements.

Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)

For families, child seat safety is paramount. The Chevrolet Volt 2019‘s LATCH system was evaluated for ease of use and effectiveness.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Child Seat Anchors (LATCH) Marginal
Overall evaluation Marginal
Vehicle trim LT
Seat type cloth

The LATCH system in the Chevrolet Volt 2019 received a “Marginal” rating. While the vehicle has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and an additional position with a tether anchor, usability issues impacted the rating.

Child Seat Anchor Details by Seating Position

Position Rating Details
1 Marginal Tether anchor (easy-to-find, but confusing hardware), Lower anchors (too deep, too much force needed)
2 Marginal Tether anchor (easy-to-find, but confusing hardware), Lower anchors (none available)
3 Marginal Tether anchor (easy-to-find, but confusing hardware), Lower anchors (too deep, too much force needed)

Technical Measurements: Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)

Seat Position Lower Anchor A Details Lower Anchor B Details Tether Anchor Details
Seat position 21 Open access: No, Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: could not measure, Clearance angle: 106 degrees Open access: No, Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: could not measure, Clearance angle: 108 degrees Location: Middle seatback, Confusing hardware: Yes, Contrasting label within 3 inches: No
Seat position 22 No lower latch available No lower latch available Location: Middle seatback, Confusing hardware: Yes, Contrasting label within 3 inches: No
Seat position 23 Open access: No, Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: could not measure, Clearance angle: 105 degrees Open access: No, Depth: 2-4 cm, Force: could not measure, Clearance angle: 105 degrees Location: Middle seatback, Confusing hardware: Yes, Contrasting label within 3 inches: No

Conclusion: Chevrolet Volt 2019 – A Safe Hybrid Choice

The Chevrolet Volt 2019 demonstrates a strong commitment to safety, achieving top “Good” ratings in most crash tests, including small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side crash, roof strength, and head restraints & seats. While headlight ratings vary from “Good” to “Acceptable” depending on the trim and package, and the LATCH system is rated “Marginal,” the overall safety profile of the Chevrolet Volt 2019 is commendable. Its “Superior” and “Advanced” ratings for optional front crash prevention systems further enhance its safety appeal. For buyers seeking a safe and fuel-efficient plug-in hybrid, the Chevrolet Volt 2019 is a strong contender.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *