The Honda CR-V has been a popular choice for families and individuals alike, consistently praised for its reliability, fuel efficiency, and versatility. For those considering the 2022 Honda CR-V, safety is paramount. This article delves into the comprehensive safety ratings and crash test performance of the 2022 Honda CR-V, providing a detailed analysis based on rigorous testing standards.
Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Driver-Side
The small overlap front crash test simulates a collision where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end impacts an object, like a tree or pole. This is a particularly challenging test, focusing on the structural integrity of the car’s safety cage and the effectiveness of restraints.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V, part of the 2017-2022 model generation, underwent the driver-side small overlap front test. Honda conducted this test, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) assigned the ratings based on their data.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Chest | Good (G) |
| Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
The 2022 Honda CR-V achieved a “Good” rating in all aspects of the driver-side small overlap test. This indicates that the structure of the vehicle effectively protected the driver space, and the restraint systems worked well to minimize injury risk.
Technical measurements from the test provide further insights:
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Lower Occupant Compartment | |
| Lower hinge pillar max | 6 |
| Footrest | 9 |
| Left toepan | 13 |
| Brake pedal | 10 |
| Rocker panel lateral average | 4 |
| Upper Occupant Compartment | |
| Steering column | 1 |
| Upper hinge pillar max | 5 |
| Upper dash | 4 |
| Lower instrument panel | 4 |
These measurements show the extent of intrusion into the occupant compartment during the crash. Lower numbers indicate less intrusion, meaning better structural performance in maintaining survival space for the driver.
Driver Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 302 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 9 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.25 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 23 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.3 |
| Right | 0.0 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.52 |
| Right | 0.69 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 1.2 |
| Right | 2.5 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 53 |
| Right | 64 |
These injury measures, such as HIC (Head Injury Criterion) for head injury and chest compression, are crucial in assessing the potential for real-world injuries. Lower values are better, indicating a lower risk of significant injuries. The 2022 Honda CR-V demonstrates low injury measures across the board in this test.
Small Overlap Front Crash Test: Passenger-Side
Similar to the driver-side test, the passenger-side small overlap test evaluates how well the vehicle protects the front passenger in a similar type of collision.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V also underwent the passenger-side small overlap frontal test, with ratings again assigned by IIHS based on Honda’s test data.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Chest | Good (G) |
| Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Chest | Good (G) |
| Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
The 2022 Honda CR-V once again achieved a “Good” rating across all categories for the passenger side. This consistent “Good” performance in small overlap tests highlights the vehicle’s robust safety engineering for both front occupants.
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Passenger Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Lower Occupant Compartment | |
| Lower hinge pillar max | 5 |
| Footrest | 6 |
| Right toepan | 4 |
| Center toepan | 4 |
| Rocker panel lateral average | 1 |
| Upper Occupant Compartment | |
| Center dash | 2 |
| Upper hinge pillar max | 3 |
| Upper dash | 3 |
| Right lower dash | 3 |
Intrusion measurements for the passenger side are also low, indicating effective structural protection.
Passenger Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 73 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 12 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.23 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 23 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.9 |
| Right | 0.3 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.35 |
| Right | 0.43 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 1.1 |
| Right | 1.0 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 34 |
| Right | 49 |
Driver Injury Measures (Passenger Side Test)
Interestingly, driver injury measures are also recorded in the passenger-side test, likely due to the symmetrical nature of the test setup and potential insights into overall vehicle deformation.
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 61 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 11 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.19 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 20 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.4 |
| Right | 0.1 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.40 |
| Right | 0.20 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 0.8 |
| Right | 0.6 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 100 |
| Right | 59 |
Both passenger and driver injury measures are low in this test, reaffirming the 2022 Honda CR-V’s strong performance in small overlap frontal crashes.
Moderate Overlap Front Crash Test: Original Test
The moderate overlap front crash test is a more traditional frontal crash test, involving a larger portion of the vehicle’s front end in the impact.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V was subjected to two moderate overlap frontal tests: one by the IIHS and another by Honda. The ratings are based on the results of both tests.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Chest | Good (G) |
| Leg/foot, left | Good (G) |
| Leg/foot, right | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
The 2022 Honda CR-V earned a “Good” rating overall and in all specific categories for the original moderate overlap front crash test. This indicates excellent protection in a more common type of frontal collision.
Action shot during the moderate overlap frontal crash test of the 2022 Honda CR-V, demonstrating vehicle deformation.
Post-crash dummy position in the 2022 Honda CR-V, showing well-maintained driver survival space.
Grease paint on the dummy’s head indicates proper contact with the airbag and head restraint during the 2022 Honda CR-V moderate overlap frontal crash test.
Minimal intrusion into the driver’s side of the 2022 Honda CR-V in the moderate overlap frontal crash test.
Technical measurements further detail the vehicle’s performance:
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) – VTF1702 | Measurement (cm) – CEF1702 |
|---|---|---|
| Footwell intrusion | ||
| Footrest | 5 | 5 |
| Left | 9 | 8 |
| Center | 9 | 6 |
| Right | 9 | 6 |
| Brake pedal | 4 | 5 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement | ||
| Left | 1 | 1 |
| Right | 1 | 0 |
| Steering column movement | ||
| Upward | 1 | 1 |
| Rearward | -1 | -2 |
| A-pillar rearward movement | 0 | 0 |
These intrusion measurements remain minimal across both tests, demonstrating consistent structural integrity.
Driver Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement – VTF1702 | Measurement – CEF1702 |
|---|---|---|
| Head | ||
| HIC-15 | 192 | 225 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact | no contact |
| Neck | ||
| Tension (kN) | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 9 | 6 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 26 | 21 |
| Legs | ||
| Femur force – left (kN) | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Femur force – right (kN) | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Knee displacement – left (mm) | 0 | 0 |
| Knee displacement – right (mm) | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index – left | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Maximum tibia index – right | 0.64 | 0.84 |
| Tibia axial force – left (kN) | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| Tibia axial force – right (kN) | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | ||
| Left | 60 | 46 |
| Right | 62 | 52 |
Injury measures are low in both tests, indicating a low risk of significant injuries in a moderate overlap frontal crash for the 2022 Honda CR-V.
Moderate Overlap Front Crash Test: Updated Test
IIHS updated the moderate overlap front crash test to include a rear passenger dummy to assess rear seat safety, reflecting a broader focus on occupant protection.
Rating Applies to 2021-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V, as part of the 2021-22 models, was evaluated under this updated test.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Poor (P) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Chest | Good (G) |
| Thigh/hip | Good (G) |
| Leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Marginal (M) |
| Chest | Poor (P) |
| Thigh | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | Acceptable (A) |
While the 2022 Honda CR-V maintained “Good” ratings for driver injury measures and structure, it received a “Poor” overall rating due to “Marginal” and “Poor” ratings for rear passenger head/neck and chest injury measures, respectively. This indicates a potential weakness in rear passenger protection in this specific scenario.
Vehicle damage following the updated moderate overlap frontal crash test of the 2022 Honda CR-V, highlighting occupant compartment integrity.
Rear passenger dummy head position in the 2022 Honda CR-V after the updated moderate overlap frontal crash test.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicating chest injury risk in the 2022 Honda CR-V updated moderate overlap frontal crash test.
Rear passenger dummy lap belt position remained optimal during the updated moderate overlap frontal crash test of the 2022 Honda CR-V.
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Footwell intrusion | |
| Footrest | 4 |
| Left | 10 |
| Center | 9 |
| Right | 13 |
| Brake pedal | 3 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Steering column movement | |
| Upward | 0 |
| Rearward | -2 |
| A-pillar rearward movement | 0 |
Driver-side intrusion measurements remain low, consistent with the “Good” structure rating.
Driver Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 298 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.2 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 13 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.26 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 27 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 0.6 |
| Right | 0.2 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.26 |
| Right | 0.44 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 1.9 |
| Right | 1.9 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 47 |
| Right | 61 |
Driver injury measures are still “Good,” indicating that the issue lies primarily in rear passenger protection in this updated test scenario.
Rear Passenger Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 2.8 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.1 |
| Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion | no contact |
| Chest | |
| Chest index | 51 |
| Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 7.2 |
| Thigh (kN) | |
| Left femur compression | 0.6 |
| Right femur compression | 0.5 |
Elevated chest index values for the rear passenger dummy are the primary reason for the “Poor” chest rating and the overall “Poor” evaluation in this updated moderate overlap test for the 2022 Honda CR-V.
Side Crash Test: Original Test
The side crash test evaluates vehicle safety in side-impact collisions.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V received “Good” ratings in all aspects of the original side crash test.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Torso | Good (G) |
| Pelvis/leg | Good (G) |
| Driver head protection | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Torso | Good (G) |
| Pelvis/leg | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger head protection | Good (G) |
This “Good” performance across the board demonstrates robust side-impact protection for both front and rear occupants in the original test scenario.
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat | -18.0 |
The negative value indicates that the intrusion stopped short of the driver’s seat centerline, signifying good structural performance in limiting cabin intrusion.
Driver Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 201 |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.2 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 50 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.5 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 35 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 25 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.22 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.41 |
| Pelvis | |
| Iliac force (kN) | 1.5 |
| Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.1 |
| Combined force (kN) | 2.5 |
| Left femur | |
| L-M force (kN) | 1.1 |
| L-M moment (Nm) | 33 |
| A-P moment (Nm) | 145 |
Passenger Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 61 |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.2 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.9 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 42 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.4 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 39 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 30 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.88 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.51 |
| Pelvis | |
| Iliac force (kN) | 0.7 |
| Acetabulum force (kN) | 2.8 |
| Combined force (kN) | 3.2 |
| Left femur | |
| L-M force (kN) | 0.5 |
| L-M moment (Nm) | 22 |
| A-P moment (Nm) | 12 |
Injury measures for both driver and passenger are low, confirming the “Good” ratings in the original side crash test for the 2022 Honda CR-V.
Side Crash Test: Updated Test
The side crash test was updated to be more demanding, using a heavier barrier and higher impact speed to simulate a more severe side collision.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
In the updated side crash test, the 2022 Honda CR-V received an “Acceptable” overall rating, a step down from the “Good” rating in the original test, but still indicating a reasonable level of protection.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Acceptable (A) |
| Structure and safety cage | Acceptable (A) |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Torso | Good (G) |
| Pelvis | Acceptable (A) |
| Driver head protection | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Torso | Marginal (M) |
| Pelvis | Acceptable (A) |
| Rear passenger head protection | Good (G) |
While driver head/neck and torso protection remained “Good,” pelvis protection was “Acceptable.” Rear passenger torso protection was “Marginal,” and pelvis protection was “Acceptable,” leading to the overall “Acceptable” rating.
View of the 2022 Honda CR-V after the updated side crash test, showing structural damage.
Interior view of the 2022 Honda CR-V after the updated side crash test, revealing side airbag deployment and occupant compartment damage.
Grease paint indicating driver dummy head protection by side airbags in the 2022 Honda CR-V updated side crash test.
Grease paint indicating rear passenger dummy head protection by side airbags in the 2022 Honda CR-V updated side crash test.
Measures of Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat | -16.5 |
Intrusion measurements are still negative, indicating that structural integrity is maintained to an “Acceptable” level even in the more demanding updated test.
Driver Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 151 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.3 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.3 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 20 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 0.8 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 30 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 27 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.57 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.38 |
| Pelvis | |
| Combined force (kN) | 4.6 |
Passenger Injury Measures
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 352 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.2 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.6 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 47 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.8 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 43 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 39 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.99 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.79 |
| Pelvis | |
| Combined force (kN) | 4.5 |
While injury measures are still generally low, the “Acceptable” and “Marginal” ratings reflect slightly higher risks compared to the original side crash test.
Roof Strength Test
The roof strength test measures how well the roof can withstand forces in a rollover crash.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V achieved a “Good” rating in roof strength.
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
|---|---|
| Curb weight | 3,396 lbs |
| Peak force | 18,094 lbs |
| Strength-to-weight ratio | 5.33 |
A “Good” rating and a strong strength-to-weight ratio of 5.33 indicate that the 2022 Honda CR-V‘s roof provides significant protection in rollover scenarios.
Head Restraints & Seats
Head restraints and seats are crucial for preventing neck injuries in rear-end collisions.
Seat type: Manual cloth seat
The 2022 Honda CR-V with manual cloth seats received a “Good” overall rating for head restraints and seats.
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
|---|---|
| Dynamic rating | Good (G) |
| Seat/head restraint geometry | Good (G) |
This “Good” rating signifies effective head restraint and seat design in minimizing whiplash injuries in rear impacts.
Technical Measurements
| Seat type | Manual cloth seat |
|---|---|
| Geometry | |
| Backset (mm) | 26 |
| Distance below top of head (mm) | 38 |
| Seat design parameters | |
| Pass/fail | Pass |
| Max T1 acceleration (g) | 13.1 |
| Head contact time (ms) | 52 |
| Force rating | 1 |
| Neck forces | |
| Max neck shear force (N) | 0 |
| Max neck tension (N) | 267 |
These technical measurements support the “Good” rating, showing favorable geometry and dynamic performance in preventing neck injuries.
Headlights
Headlight performance is critical for nighttime visibility and accident prevention. The 2022 Honda CR-V has different headlight options depending on the trim level.
Trim Level: Touring & Hybrid Touring
Rating Applies to 2020-22 Models
These trims feature LED reflector headlights and achieve a “Good” overall rating.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | Good (G) |
“Good” rated headlights provide optimal visibility for the driver in various driving conditions.
Headlight Performance Measurements (Touring & Hybrid Touring Trims)
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Glare |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 94.7 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 53.9 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 64.1 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 52.5 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 49.3 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 46.3 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 167.7 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 150.5 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 81.4 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 75.0 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 57.3 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 55.4 m |
Trim Level: Hybrid EX & Hybrid EX-L
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
These trims also use LED reflector headlights but receive an “Acceptable” overall rating.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | Acceptable (A) |
“Acceptable” headlights offer adequate visibility, but not as optimal as the “Good” rated option.
Headlight Performance Measurements (Hybrid EX & Hybrid EX-L Trims)
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Glare |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 100.0 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 59.8 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 64.1 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 54.2 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 56.9 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 48.5 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 144.4 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 105.1 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 75.0 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 68.8 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 61.6 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 54.9 m |
Trim Level: LX, EX, EX-L, Special Edition
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
These trims come with Halogen projector headlights and receive a “Marginal” overall rating.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
| High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
| Overall rating | Marginal (M) |
“Marginal” headlights indicate less than ideal visibility and potential safety concerns during nighttime driving.
Headlight Performance Measurements (LX, EX, EX-L, Special Edition Trims)
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) | Glare |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 90.9 m | 21.2% |
| Straightaway left edge | 59.3 m | 21.2% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 55.0 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 47.9 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 45.5 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 40.5 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 155.8 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 131.9 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 66.2 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 64.6 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 49.5 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 46.8 m |
The headlight ratings highlight the importance of trim selection when considering nighttime driving safety with the 2022 Honda CR-V.
Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Forward collision prevention systems are designed to mitigate or prevent front-end collisions with other vehicles.
Applies to 2020-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V with its standard Collision Mitigation Braking System earned a “Superior” rating in vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention.
| Overall evaluation | Superior |
|---|---|
| Forward Collision Warning | Meets requirements |
| 12 mph test | Collision Avoided |
| 25 mph test | Collision Avoided |
This “Superior” rating demonstrates the effectiveness of the 2022 Honda CR-V’s automatic emergency braking system in preventing collisions at both lower and higher speeds in vehicle-to-vehicle scenarios.
Front Crash Prevention: Pedestrian (Day)
Pedestrian front crash prevention systems aim to detect pedestrians and automatically brake to avoid or reduce the severity of pedestrian collisions.
Applies to 2020-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V also achieved a “Superior” rating for pedestrian front crash prevention (daytime).
| Overall evaluation | Superior |
|---|---|
| Crossing child (12 mph) | Impact speed reduced by 10 mph |
| Crossing child (25 mph) | Impact speed reduced by 18 mph |
| Crossing adult (12 mph) | Collision Avoided |
| Crossing adult (25 mph) | Collision Avoided |
| Parallel adult (25 mph) | Collision Avoided |
| Parallel adult (37 mph) | Impact speed reduced by 30 mph |
The “Superior” rating in pedestrian front crash prevention further underscores the 2022 Honda CR-V’s commitment to safety, particularly for vulnerable road users.
Seat Belt Reminders
Seat belt reminders encourage seat belt use, which is crucial for occupant protection in crashes.
Rating Applies to 2021-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V received a “Poor” rating for seat belt reminders.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Poor (P) |
| Front row | |
| Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual) | |
| Initiation time | |
| Duration | Negligible (under 8 seconds) |
| Volume | |
| Audio frequency | |
| Second row | |
| Startup status alert (visual) | None |
The “Poor” rating is primarily due to the negligible duration of the audible seat belt reminder for front occupants and the absence of a startup status alert for the second row.
Technical Measurements
| Measurement | Value |
|---|---|
| Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 54 dB |
| Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 61 dB |
| Difference between background and signal | 7.8 dB |
| Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 58 dB |
| Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 61 dB |
| Difference between background and signal | 3.9 dB |
| Dominant audio frequency | 800 Hz |
While the audible signal is present, its short duration and lack of second-row reminders contribute to the “Poor” rating.
Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children) systems make child seat installation easier and more secure.
Rating Applies to 2017-22 Models
The 2022 Honda CR-V received an “Acceptable” rating for its LATCH system.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Acceptable (A) |
| Vehicle trim | LX |
| Seat type | cloth |
While rated “Acceptable,” the 2022 Honda CR-V has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and an additional position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors.
LATCH Rating Details
| Rating | Icon | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Good | G | Good |
| Acceptable | A | Acceptable |
| Marginal | M | Marginal |
| Poor | P | Poor |
| Not Rated | Seating positions with borrowed lower anchors or only tether anchor are not rated. | |
| Tether anchor | thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
| Lower anchors | lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
| Shared lower anchors | shared lower achors symbol | Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed |
| No Hardware | No hardware available |
Details by Seating Position
| Position | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tether anchor, easy to find, may be confused with other hardware. Lower anchors not too deep, but require too much force to attach. | |
| 2 | Tether anchor hard to find, may be confused with other hardware. Lower anchors – 1 dedicated, 1 borrowed. Not too deep, too much force. | |
| 3 | Tether anchor easy to find, may be confused with other hardware. Lower anchors not too deep, too much force. |
The “Acceptable” rating reflects some usability issues with the LATCH system, such as the force required to attach lower anchors and potential confusion with other hardware, despite having a functional system.
Technical Measurements (Seat Position 21, 22, 23)
(Detailed measurements for each anchor point are provided in the original article, but omitted here for brevity. Refer to original article for specific measurements.)
Conclusion
The 2022 Honda CR-V demonstrates a strong commitment to safety, achieving “Good” ratings in many key crash tests, including small overlap front, original moderate overlap front, original side, roof strength, and head restraints. It also boasts “Superior” ratings for vehicle-to-vehicle and pedestrian front crash prevention systems.
However, the updated moderate overlap front test revealed a “Poor” overall rating due to rear passenger chest protection concerns, and the updated side crash test resulted in an “Acceptable” rating, indicating areas for potential improvement. Additionally, the seat belt reminder system is rated “Poor,” and the LATCH system is “Acceptable,” suggesting minor shortcomings in these areas.
Overall, the 2022 Honda CR-V offers a robust suite of safety features and strong crashworthiness, making it a safe choice for drivers and passengers. However, prospective buyers should be aware of the “Poor” rating in the updated moderate overlap test and “Acceptable” rating in the updated side crash test, especially if rear passenger safety is a primary concern. Choosing higher trim levels with “Good” rated headlights is also recommended for optimal nighttime visibility.
